Friday, April 15, 2011

Under Surveillance



Samantha Davies, who is the famous fashion model thinks about celebrities' rights to privacy that journalist and celebrities should respect to each other. She knows that celebrities' life style  is the most phenomenon thing for paparazzi and she thinks if journalists were considerate adequately, celebrities would be more willing to cooperate with them. I agree with this idea due to they need to each other;  journalists want to report as news for commercial while celebrities want to be more famous. Civil liberties include to protect privacy life, most people don't want to feel under surveillance. Therefore, journalists  should take care of famous people' rights. we say always there is a alternate way to everyone to be happy :)
(Dilara&Büşra)

3 comments:

  1. that's a acceptable idea but there are some issues about that. anyway i don't want to talk about now. and hey there is 'basın' out there. funny. bye.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I read Samantha Davies "paragraph" and I didn't understand it much ;) According to your blog, if I am right, I understand that she feels uncomfortable to being watched by paparazzi. But she has to accept that because of her job. It's the fashion, that's the fashion, you know :D :D. This is a dilemma if you are a modal. You have to be caught by magazines otherwise, you need a private life. But, for me, everybody has own rights to want privacy. It is hard to comment on this issue :(

    ReplyDelete
  3. Dilara, you and Busra wrote a very nice paragraph, weell done. Your comments are very understanding of the life of a celebrity and sympathetic as well. I am not sure that I agree. I think that many celebrities are really on famous because of all the attention and do very little to become that way except to behave badly, then when there are too many cameras they complain. To me it seems hypocritical but maybe I am just jealous. What do you think about for normal people? Do the same rules apply as for celebrities?

    ReplyDelete